Judge changes rape charges to “Theft of Services”
Friday, November 2nd, 2007
I mentioned yesterday that I was grumpy. Reason 1 was due to Dallas’ new “Pull up your Pants” campaign.
Reason 2 has to do with Philadelphia Municipal Judge Teresa Carr Deni. Pull up a seat and I’ll explain why Judge Deni has me pissed off.
A young man, Dominique Gindraw, contacted a young woman he found on craigslist and negotiated to have sex with her for the sum of $150 for one hours service. When the young woman arrived at the agreed location she found herself not in his home as she’d expected but rather in an abandoned building in North Philly.
Mr. Gindraw then asked her if she’d have sex with his friend, too, which she agreed to do for another $100. My guess is that she realized she was in trouble at that point and figured she was better off negotiating for more money than trying to leave.
The friend arrived without money but carrying a gun. Men continued to arrive until a 5th man arrived and questioned why the young woman was crying. He helped her to dress and leave.
Yes, the girl had prostituted herself and put herself in a dangerous situation but what happened next is what pissed me off.
The case goes to court. The Defendant, Dominique Gindraw, is, of course, charged with sex and assault charges.
This is where Judge Deni comes into the equation. Judge Deni drops all charges and instead charges Gindraw with armed robbery for “theft of services”.
Theft of services? Since when did sex forced by gunpoint cease to be rape? When asked about her decision Judge Deni replied:
“She consented and she didn’t get paid . . . I thought it was a robbery.”
“Did she tell you she had another client before she went to report it?” Deni asked a reporter.
“I thought rape was a terrible trauma.”
A case like this, she said - to the reporters astonishment - “minimizes true rape cases and demeans women who are really raped.”
Four days later, Mr. Gindraw was in court charged with a nearly identical crime against another woman. The prosecutor, still stunned from the first case, refused to present the second case and therefore Judge Deni threw out the case entirely.
The police detective stated that both women “were in fear for their lives. Since they saw one of the doers really well, it crossed both of their minds that they’d be killed.” He went on to say that Judges actions were ” frankly, appalling”.
Deni stated that she has to “sleep at night with what I decide.” According to Deni, she slept well that night.
While it’s true that these women who prostitute themselves and foolishly put themselves in danger are somewhat difficult to feel sorry for, the law isn’t about how “worthy” the victim is or is not.
Reducing rape to “theft of services” is an insult to all rape victims. The judges contemptuous, dismissive attitude toward these young women is tantamount to raping them a second time. The chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association agrees:
“The victim has been brutalized twice in this case: first by the assailants, and now by the court,” Chancellor Jane Leslie Dalton wrote. “We cannot imagine any circumstances more violent or coercive than being forced to have sex with four men at gunpoint.”
Being prostitutes doesn’t make them less human and as often as not these young women get there by having suffered domestic violence growing up. I suspect that the judge had a much luckier upbringing.
The prosecutor in both cases says he’ll reinstate the charges, re-file and present to a different judge.
As one reporter said, “Hopefully, the next judge will be better able to differentiate between a violated business agreement and a violent attack.”
http://www.kansascity.com/440/story/341070.html
Deni, Philadelphia, rape, craigslist, prostitution, theft of services

How ironic is it that today, on World Poverty Day, I should see the newest addition to